Sichos In English | Holidays Shabbat Calendar | ב״ה |
Volume 1 | Volume 2 | Volume 3 | Volume 4 | Volume 5 |
I Will Write It In Their Hearts - Volume 5 A Treasury of Letters from the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson Selections from Igros Kodesh A letter of condolence to a kabbalist whose sister passed away Translated by: Rabbi Eli Touger Published and copyright © by Sichos In English (718) 778-5436 • info@SichosInEnglish.org • FAX (718) 735-4139
|
Advice to a chassid concerning establishing himself in business | Table of contents | A Shavuos message, quoted heavily from the words of the Rebbe Rayatz |
No. 612
This letter was sent to R. Efraim Eliezer HaKohen Yallis, one of the leading Rabbis in Philadelphia.B"H, 25 Iyar, 5710Greetings and blessings,
I was sorry to hear of the passing of your sister, the Rebbetzin.
Note the statements of Kehilas Yaakov, entry achosi ("my sister"), that the word achos (sister) is an acronym for the words ephod, choshen, Tiferes and Malchus.[460] As is well known, Taamei HaMitzvos from R. Chayim Vital (Parshas Tetzaveh) and several other sources in the writings of the AriZal identify the ephod with Malchus and the choshen with Z'eir Anpin.[461]
It can be explained that this is the reason that the beginning of the destruction (which is referred to as mourning in our Sages' words) was noticeable in the ephod in that the urim and the tumim were lacking. For this reason, the prohibition "The choshen shall not be separated from the ephod"[462] applied only in the time of the Beis HaMikdash. In the era of exile, by contrast, "the river was destroyed,"[463] [referring to] the first Beis HaMikdash and "dried up,"463 [referring to] the second Beis HaMikdash. Moreover, even in the era of the Beis HaMikdash, one receives lashes only when [the separation is made] in a destructive manner, for the union between Z'eir Anpin and Nukvah[464] is not continuous. Rav Saadia Gaon did not include this commandment in his enumeration of the mitzvos at all. (See the explanations of R. Perlow [in his commentary to Sefer HaMitzvos,] negative commandment 212.) Therefore the correction must be fundamentally in the inner and external dimensions of Malchus, or in [the connection between] Yesod and Malchus,which are identified with Zion and Jerusalem,[465] as explained in Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, p. 60a, and Devarim, p. 1c.
May the Omnipresent comfort you among the other mourners of Zion and Jerusalem and may we all merit the fulfillment of the promise: "A kohen will appear in Zion,"[466] serving with the ephod and the choshen,and they will not be separated from each other at all.
Notes:
- (Back to text) [The acronym includes the term u'malchus, "and Malchus." An ephod is one of the priestly garments; see Hilchos Klei HaMikdash 9:9 for a description. The choshen was the High Priest's breastplate; see ibid.: 6-8 for a description. Tiferes, lit. "beauty," is one of the middos of Atzilus, as is Malchus, lit. "sovereignty."]
- (Back to text) [Lit., "the small countenance," the kabbalistic term for the emotional attributes of the realm of Atzilus, of which Tiferes is the primary attribute.]
- (Back to text) [Shmos 28:28; see Sefer HaMitzvos (negative commandment 87) and Sefer HaChinuch (mitzvah 100).]
- (Back to text) [Yeshayahu 19:5; the Rebbe is referring to the interpretation of this verse in the Zohar I, p. 26a.]
- (Back to text) [Which are symbolized by the choshen and the ephod. Nukvah is another term used for Malchus.]
- (Back to text) [And thus are related to the traditional message of comfort with which the Rebbe concludes the letter.]
- (Back to text) [An expression commonly used in the Sephardic community. The recipient of this letter, R. Yallis, was a kohen.]
Advice to a chassid concerning establishing himself in business | Table of contents | A Shavuos message, quoted heavily from the words of the Rebbe Rayatz |
Volume 1 | Volume 2 | Volume 3 | Volume 4 | Volume 5 |